nature-reviewer
Provide evidence-grounded mock peer review of scientific manuscripts or
by yuan1z0825Free
Description
nature-reviewer is an agent skill that simulates a Nature-style peer review of a scientific manuscript or an excerpt. It produces an evidence-grounded reviewer assessment that covers significance, validity, and major and minor concerns, written from the referee's side. It is for reviewer-style evaluation of a manuscript before you submit it, or to see how a referee might read it. It is not for drafting your response to reviewers. The skill states that if you want a rebuttal, you should use the nature-response skill instead. Its default stance is set out at the start of the skill and governs the whole assessment. Use it to find weak points in a draft, such as an overclaimed result or a missing control, before a real referee does. The output is a simulation of one reviewer's view, not an actual peer review, and it should be treated as a checklist of concerns to address rather than a verdict on the work. It is part of the yuan1z0825/nature-skills repository on GitHub, which has about 48,400 stars. The listing shows it as free, and it has about 13,000 installs. Its security audits show passes from Gen Agent Trust Hub, Socket and Snyk.…
Highlights
- Simulated Nature-style reviewer assessment
- Significance and validity concerns
- Major and minor concerns
- Works on manuscripts or excerpts
- Routes rebuttal writing to nature-response
Ratings & Reviews
No ratings yet
Be the first to rate nature-reviewer.
People also visit
academic-paper-reviewer
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas
nature-response
Draft, audit, or revise responses to peer review, revision cover letters
literature-review
Systematic literature-review workflow for academic, biomedical, technical
nature-reviewer FAQ
What does it produce?
A simulated reviewer assessment of a manuscript or excerpt, covering significance, validity and major and minor concerns.
Does it write my response to reviewers?
No. The skill says rebuttal writing belongs to the nature-response skill.
Is the output a real peer review?
No. It simulates one referee's view, so it is best used as a checklist of concerns.
Who is it for?
Authors who want to test a draft against a referee's reading before submission.
How do I install it?
Run npx skills add https://github.com/yuan1z0825/nature-skills --skill nature-reviewer.
Is it checked for security?
Its security audits show passes from Gen Agent Trust Hub, Socket and Snyk.
What are the best nature-reviewer alternatives?
Popular alternatives to nature-reviewer include academic-paper-reviewer, peer-review and scientific-writing. See all nature-reviewer alternatives